Matthew Jenkins

Email: mgj@hughmans.co.uk

Download vCard

Hughmans
32 Farringdon Street
London EC4A 4HJ
T: 020 7246 6560
F: 020 7236 7896

Profile

“The “excellent” Matthew Jenkins of Hughmans is frequently sought for libel cases involving allegations of criminal activity. Commentators note: “He has a natural ability for libel and privacy cases: he’s very active and extremely hard-working.” Chambers & Partners Guide 2016

“Matthew Jenkins of Hughmans thoroughly impresses market sources, including one barrister who refers to him as “a standout solicitor – one of those people who is able to turn his hand to anything and do it well. He’s not confined to the area of law he’s practising in and always asks incisive questions.” His claimant-focused work usually stems from his wider expertise in crime, covering issues of defamation and breach of confidence.” Chambers & Partners UK Guide 2015

“Matthew Jenkins of Hughmans is an “excellent litigator” with a background in criminal and fraud matters. He was recently involved in a successful libel action against Bedfordshire Police relating to an allegation of unlawful killing.” Chambers & Partners UK Guide 2014

Matthew Jenkins is recommended as a top ranked lawyer in the field of Defamation and Reputation Management by leading industry guide Chambers & Partners.

Solicitor-advocate specialising in civil claims involving allegations of criminal conduct such as civil fraud (including freezing injunctions and other emergency remedies) and defamation. Also has extensive experience of inheritance/probate disputes and civil aspects of restraint and confiscation proceedings under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002.

 

undefined

Cases

Acting for a Defendant accused of conspiracy to breach freezing injunctions in order to evade judgment debts totalling over $4.6bn. Issues including privilege against self incrimination in relation to asset disclosure JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov & Anr [2016] EWHC 289 (Comm); cross examination on asset disclosure under the Hague convention [2016] EWHC 1346 (Comm); the elements of a claim for unlawful means conspiracy and jurisdictional challenges based on the Lugano Convention: [2016] EWHC 230 (Comm) [2017] EWCA Civ 40 (appeal to the Supreme Court now pending).

Prosecuting multi million pound breach of contract claim against a member of the Saudi royal family, including successfully resisting appeal on the question of State Immunity: Harb v Prince Aziz [2015] EWCA Civ 481 and succeeding at trial in establishing liability Harb v Prince Aziz [2015] EWHC 3155 (Ch); contesting appeal on the questions of lack of judicial reasoning and alleged judicial bias [2016] EWCA Civ 556; successfully defeating application for an unless order in relation to non payment of interim costs [2017] EWHC 258 (Ch).

Acting for Defendant in claim for misfeasance involving consideration of tracing remedies and mixing of funds: Richard Hunt Investments Limited v Hunt [2017] EWHC 988 (Ch).

Leading case on costs orders in the Court of Protection: In re: A (A patient) [2016] 4 WLR 141.

Long running dispute concerning complex property fraud on the estate of a deceased Kuwaiti Sheikh involving proceedings in England, Gibraltar, Kuwait and Canada; defeating libel claim; prosecuting freezing injunction and enforcement proceedings; successfully resisting challenge in the Court of Appeal to a suspended committal order obtained against a judgment debtor; obtaining judgment and successfully pursuing tracing claims for money misappropriated in breach of fiduciary duty (Al Baho and Ors v Meerza [2011] EWHC 2984 (QB) (Al Baho and Ors v Meerza [2013] EWHC 2523 (QB)) (Al Baho and Ors v Meerza [2014] EWCA Civ 669) (Meerza & Ors v Al Baho [2015] EWHC 3154 (Ch)).

Fraudulent misrepresentation in pre contract enquiries on sale of nightclub premises; questions of inducement and reliance (Edwards v Ashik [2014] EWHC 2454 (Ch)).

€100m fraud claim based on Maltese law (Group Seven Ltd and Anor v Allied Investment Corporation Ltd and Ors [2014] EWHC 2046 (Ch)). Successful application for disclosure of documents in reliance on the fraud exception to Legal Professional Privilege (Group Seven Limited v Allied Investment Corporation Limited and Ors [2013] EWHC 1423 (Ch)). Successful resistance of committal application relating to alleged breach of a freezing injunction (Group Seven Limited v Allied Investment Corporation Limited and Ors [2013] EWHC 1509 (Ch)).

Libel actions concerning allegations of serious criminal conduct (Hunt v Evening Standard Ltd [2011] EWHC 272 (QB) (18 February 2011) (Hunt v Times Newspapers Ltd [2012] EWHC 110 (QB) (30 January 2012) (Hunt v Times Newspapers Ltd [2012] EWHC 1220 (QB) (10 May 2012) (Hunt v Times Newspapers Ltd[2013] EWHC 1868 (QB)).

Libel claim against Police concerning allegation of unlawful killing (Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire [2012] EWHC 1525 (QB)).

Priority afforded by registration of Charging Order in enforcement of judgment debt (Hughmans v Central Stream Services Limited [2012] EWCA Civ 1720).

Establishing in High Court action that wife of convicted drug trafficker had a beneficial interest in a valuable property, despite adverse findings in Crown Court confiscation proceedings (CPS v Piper [2011] EWHC 3570 (Admin)).

Acting for executors of deceased Australian music executive Peter Ikin in claim for forgery and fraud. Issues over payment of legal costs from funds restrained by freezing and proprietary injunctions (Re: Ikin, deceased; sub nom Court v Despallieres (2009) (Roth J.) 153 (38) S.J.L.B. 30). Prosecuting committal proceedings for breaches of Court orders; complicated legal issues concerning the interrelationship between the laws of England and Australia and the effect of a civil partnership. Obtaining summary judgment on a point of law under s18B of the Wills Act 1837 (Re: Ikin, deceased; sub nom Court and Ors v Despallieres [2010] 2 All E.R. 451).

Dispute between executors of valuable estate (Goodman and another v Goodman and another [2013] 3 All ER 490).

First substantial claim brought by Assets Recovery Agency under Part 5 of POCA (civil recovery orders); leading authority on scope and application of Part 5 of POCA (ARA v Green and others [2005] EWHC 3168 (Admin)).

Several other cases against the Assets Recovery Agency and the Serious Organised Crime Agency under POCA, including leading case on the Court’s jurisdiction to make freezing injunctions in support of claims under Part 6 of POCA (Assets Recovery Agency v McCormack [2007] EWHC 908 (QB)).

Acting for antiquities dealer alleged to have operated in partnership and to have hidden assets from the executors of his deceased partner. Successful appeal to the Court of Appeal concerning breach of Human Rights Act on committal application for breaches of freezing injunctions (Robin James Symes v Jonathan Guy Anthony Phillips and Ors [2005] EWCA Civ 553).

Acting for pawn broker establishing liability for fraud on the basis of non-disclosure (Advanced Industrial Technology Corporation Limited v Condrup [2006] EWCA Civ 923).

Acting for clients in seeking the return of substantial sums of cash seized by the authorities, including leading case on application of the civil standard of proof in cash forfeiture proceedings (Butt v HM Customs and Excise [2002] 166 JP 173) and case concerning application of the inherent jurisdiction of the Court to strike out claims for delay (Fay v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire [2003] EWCA Civ 1770).

Resisting increase in confiscation order after long delay by HM Customs and Excise in enforcement (In the Matter of Saggar [2005] EWCA Civ 174).

Resisting enforcement of confiscation order where it would involve a breach of the anti-retrospectivity provisions of the Human Rights Act 1998 (Togher v Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office and Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 686).