020 7246 6560 / info@hughmans.co.uk

LASPO 2012 – An ‘Emasculation’ of Legal Aid?

5th April 2013

On the 1st of April 2013, major parts of the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act came into force. The Act makes sweeping changes to the way legal services are funded. Among the key changes are:

1) The removal of legal aid entirely from areas of the Civil Law, in virtue of Schedule 1 of the Act;

2) The abolition of the Legal Services Commission and its replacement with the Legal Aid Agency

3) The creation of a Legal Aid ‘Director’ who must require those who qualify for legal aid to provide documentary evidence of their financial resources to determine the extent of any contributions due;

4) Setting the maximum income threshold at £12,475 for automatic entitlement to criminal legal aid. Anyone earning over this sum will be subject to an assessment of their disposable income;

5) Where an applicant has an income greater than £12,475 and a disposable income of greater than £3,398, they will be required to make contributions to the cost of their representation.

There remains signifncant confusion about the implementation of the Act. This has not stopped it being called, among other things, an ‘emasculation’ of Legal Aid by Sir Allen Ward J of the Court of Appeal: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/234.html.

We await further details and clarification.

More articles

Hughmans’ success in Britain’s biggest insider dealing case

Operation Tabernula, which has been widely reported, was the UK’s largest and most complex insider dealing prosecution. The FCA allegation involved a group of people who were party to dealing on inside information, from employees at investment banks to intermediaries and private traders. Records found at one of the defendant’s offices recorded 59 instances of […]

Read more

Private obstetrics reinstated

Having been instructed to obtain an emergency injunction, Simon Silver has successfully obtained an interim injunction against the West Hertfordshire NHS Trust preventing them from withdrawing their private obstetrics service from our clients who are heavily pregnant. The Watford General Hospital, which is under the control and management of the West Hertfordshire NHS Trust, has […]

Read more

Complex fraud case stopped after Hughmans successfully argues there can be no fair trial

Lee Adams successfully argued for a stay of complex fraud proceedings known as R v Crawley & Others at Southwark Crown Court today alongside Alexander Cameron QC. The case is the first to be stayed as a result of the Government’s cuts to Legal Aid, which left the defendants with no prospect of adequate representation […]

Read more